Subject: [removed] Digest V01 #184
From: <[removed]@[removed]>
Date: 6/9/2001 7:49 PM
To: <[removed]@[removed];

------------------------------


                      The Old-Time Radio Digest!
                         Volume 01 : Issue 184
                   A Part of the [removed]!
                           ISSN: 1533-9289


                           Today's Topics:

 ARCHIE ANDREWS                       ["Owens Pomeroy" <opomeroy@[removed]; ]
 monitor, going places, doing things  [leonardfass@[removed] (Leonard Fass]
 RSI CORRECTION                       ["Mike Kerezman" <philipmarlowe@eart]
 Re: FRAN STRIKER and The Bono Amendm [SanctumOTR@[removed]                 ]
 RE: Lost episode???                  ["John" <JOHN007@[removed];       ]
 Re: RADIO LOGS & Copyright Catalog   [SanctumOTR@[removed]                 ]
 Re:  WNEW and "Invisible Stars"      [Donna Halper <dlh@[removed]; ]
 Catalog of Copyright Entries         ["J. Randolph Cox" <cox@[removed]]
 Question for Harlan Stone            [[removed]@[removed]        ]
 Re: X-MINUS ONE and "Tony Karloff"   [SanctumOTR@[removed]                 ]
 Nits                                 ["Richard Pratz" <[removed]@home]
 OTR CLUBS/NEWSLETTERS                ["Owens Pomeroy" <opomeroy@[removed]; ]
 "Living" Series                      ["Jerry Haendiges" <Jerry@[removed]]
 Re:Tomorrow 1949                     [Eric Cooper <ejcooper2001@[removed];]
 Protecting my butt.                  [hal stone <dualxtwo@[removed];    ]
 Harry Bartell Writing                ["Mike Kerezman" <philipmarlowe@eart]
 Please Pass the Embalming Fluid      ["Stephen A Kallis, Jr." <skallisjr@]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:50:36 -0400
From: "Owens Pomeroy" <opomeroy@[removed];
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  ARCHIE ANDREWS

This is for Harlon Stone.  I was going through the check-out line in the
Super Market the other day and spotted a (Reader's) Digest size Cartoon
Magazines of "Archie Andrews", "Betty & Veronoca", and "Archie & Jughead."
Since this is the first time I have seen them, I would like to know if this
is a  comparatively new Publication?

Owens Pomeroy

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:53:54 -0400
From: leonardfass@[removed] (Leonard Fass)
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  monitor, going places, doing things take one

the original exec producer of monitor was james fleming (sp) who was
once an announcer on our gal sunday .... as part of promotion nbc
produced a demo recording that showed what the program might have done,
had not nbc kept cutting back and back and [removed] those who heard
monitor might chime in (nbc of course) w/their memories and get us of
the subject of public domain etc.

[removed]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:19:03 -0400
From: "Mike Kerezman" <philipmarlowe@[removed];
To: <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  RSI CORRECTION

I had previously posted that RSI had contacted the EVANs X Minus One website
with a Cease and Desist letter for distributing PD shows. Yesterday I
received email from owner of this Site regarding the disposition of  RSI
actions in this matter. In all fairness to all parties, I offer this email
with all apologies due.

Mike:

Thanks for the note. I appreciate your concern regarding the RSI OTR
wrangle.

Yes, I received a letter. It was supposedly from lawyers representing RSI.
However, I later found out that this letter was actually a >hoax. Several
OTR sites received this same letter. Someone, within the OTR webring
contacted this law firm and was informed that >they did not represent RSI
and did not send out this letter. Thus the letter was a tiger without teeth.

In the meantime, I did do my research regarding several titles I offer and
did indeed find them to be in the Public domain. I obtained >certified proof
of this fact, which is good in a court of law.

I personally believe someone at RSI must have initiated the letter, though
I cannot prove it. It did seem like a well orchestrated attempt >to shutdown
several OTR sites.

Thus my statement about the letter on my site was somewhat without proof,
in that RSI had not had their "real" legal team contact me >in any way.

So, no, I will not repost to my site a statement such as I had before. I
also wish to keep private all the documentation relating to >research I have
performed on this topic. It cost a bundle to have it done, and I may well
need it shortly in a court of law. I hope not.

Thanks, I wish you the best.

Evan Armstrong
[removed]

I am apologize for giving anyone the wrong impression.
Mike Kerezman

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:20:58 -0400
From: SanctumOTR@[removed]
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  Re: FRAN STRIKER and The Bono Amendment

In a message dated 6/9/01 8:31:54 AM,  A. Joseph Ross, [removed] writes . . .

(. . . in response to my comment: It would have been nice if Fran
Striker's family had been aware of such provisions and had been able to
reacquire the LONE RANGER copyright or a major portion of it.

<I'm not sure they could have done so.  Was Fran Striker a free-lance
writer or was he an employee of Trendle or WXYZ?  If he was an employee,
his work would be a work made for hire and may not be [removed];

***Fran Striker was a self-employed freelance writer at the time of the
creation of THE LONE RANGER, providing non-exclusive use of his radio scripts
to a variety of radio stations from his home base in Buffalo (including
series like ULTRA VIOLET (science fiction), WEIRD TALES (horror), WARNER
LESTER, DR. FANG, ADVENTURES IN THE AIR and SEA HOUND).  Stations paid a
per-use charge depending on the size of the station.  Striker received $4 for
each LONE RANGER script from Detroit's WXYZ, another $4 from Buffalo's WEBR
(where John Barratt and Art Schmidt starred as the Lone Ranger and Tonto) and
$5 from Omaha's KOIL.   Sometime later, perhaps a year or so (sorry, I've
misplaced my reference materials), George W. Trendle purchased the copyright
from Striker for a pittance and the promise of a staff job at WXYZ.  BTW,
Striker kept his Buffalo office open (manned by a secretary) long after his
move to Detroit and continued to syndicate non-LONE RANGER scripts to other
stations for a number of years.

Since WXYZ later purchased the copyright to a property that had been
previously licensed to other stations, it seems to me that THE LONE RANGER
would have been an ideal candidate for Striker's surviving family to have
exercised the clause in the Bono Amendment.  (A capsule history can be found
in my historical booklet for RSI's recent LONE RANGER ON RADIO 60-show
collection, though I recommend those really interested refer to Fran Striker,
Jr's HIS TYPEWRITER GREW SPURS, Dave Holland's excellent FROM OUT OF THE
PAST: a PICTORIAL HISTORY OF THE LONE RANGER and Dick Osgood's WYXIE
WONDERLAND: AN UNAUTHORIZED 50-YEAR DIARY OF WXYZ DETROIT.)***

A. Joseph Ross, [removed] also writes:

Mr. Amari is not obligated to reveal to anyone the documentation that he
has the rights to something.  By the same token, anyone who intends to
sell OTR material has the obligation to research the rights, as Mr. Amari
has done.  Mr. Amari is right when he says you have to do your homework.

***I think people should remember that Carl was once the person receiving the
cease and desist letters from licensors like Charles Michelson . . . which
prompted Carl to DO his homework and begin making contracts with
copyright/trademark-holders.  His success depended upon it, since I'm sure
the giant retail chains wouldn't want to be charged with selling material
that violated copyrights.

(My late friend Walter Gibson was once hired to provide games and puzzles for
the backs of cereal boxes.  Interestingly, the cereal companies insisted that
Walter had to guarantee that all the puzzles and games were more than 56
years old and that none were new creations of his own.  The cereal companies
feared that they might be sued over totally original creations by another
party which had privately created something similar.  Such legal actions
could have prevented their cereal from being sold and such items had a fairly
short shelf life before spoilage.  The companies wanted to totally avoid even
threats of lawsuits and so offered to pay a good price for puzzles that could
be proven to be in public domain,)

Another lister suggests that Carl produce his contracts . . . which would
allow competition to go after licensors and perhaps create a bidding war if
they knew exactly how much RSI was paying who.  I doubt that any of us would
open our contract files to the public under these situations if we were in
Carl's place.  Having his competition know what he's paying WOULD put RSI at
a severe disadvantage . . . and the same with allowing others to the results
of copyright searches that RSI has paid for.

And RSI does have some competition.  For example, GAA has held the exclusive
license to sell SHADOW recordings for nearly a decade.  If Radio Spirits
includes an episode of THE SHADOW in one of its collections, it's because RSI
has purchased a sub-license to do so from GAA which in turn has contracts for
the rights with copyright-holder Conde Nast.  And I see OTR collections from
other outfits in my local Borders and Barnes & Noble bookstores, so there is
competition out there besides GAA.  --ANTHONY TOLLIN

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:21:04 -0400
From: "John" <JOHN007@[removed];
To: <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  RE: Lost episode???

I'm a big fan of Radio Mystery [removed]  The storyline had something to
do with an archaeological dig in >Utah.

You may be thinking of an episode called DIG ME DEADLY, which, though
somewhat predictible, is a really fun murder mystery and one of my favorite
RMT episodes.  As I recall, it deals with a murder mystery among
students/professors/scientists on an archeological dig, and is told from the
perspective of a reporter who is constantly irritated in her persuits by a
fussy small-town sheriff.  (Don't hold me to the specifics--that's strictly
from memory and I haven't listened to the episode in some time)

I show the date of this episode as 2/13/74.

Hope this helps!

Happy Listening!
John

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:23:26 -0400
From: SanctumOTR@[removed]
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  Re: RADIO LOGS & Copyright Catalog

In a message dated 6/9/01 8:31:54 AM, JackBenny@[removed] writes:

<<...but I think I have the opportunity [removed]*GASP*...disagree with Elizabeth.
There is a document called the Catalog of Copyright Entries, which was issued
on a monthly or semi-annual basis.  It lists all the works for which a
copyright was granted during that period.  Major libraries may have a copy
available for review, and volumes go back to 1909.  They also list renewals.
Thus it should be possible to research copyrights without having to go to the
Library of [removed];>

***Just a short note to mention that the CATALOG OF COPYRIGHT ENTRIES is a
great source to research and verify OTR log material (dates, titles and
authors).
--ANTHONY TOLLIN***

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:23:24 -0400
From: Donna Halper <dlh@[removed];
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  Re:  WNEW and "Invisible Stars"

Liz wrote--
WNEW went on the air on 2/13/34, [snip]
WNEW originally broadcast on 1250 kc, and shared time two days a week
with WHBI, another small station in Newark. WNEW from the beginning
emphasised a heavy schedule of popular music, both live and recorded, and
was on a 24-hour-a-day schedule as early as 1939. It also presented heavy
coverage of local sports, including boxing matches and Newark Bears and
Jersey City Giants International League baseball.

At the risk of seeming like I am shilling for my new book ("Invisible
Stars:  A Social History of Women in American Broadcasting"), WNEW was one
of the few stations of the 30s to have a woman as program
director.  Bernice Judis became so respected as a manager that even
Broadcasting Magazine did a tribute to her.  It is she who decided to hire
Martin Block, and her critiques of WNEW announcers made them more
personable and less stiff and formal.  She expanded WNEW's news coverage,
and also expanded the station's hours on the air so that late night shift
workers would have something good to listen to.  Her reward for doing all
of this at a time when women managers were rare, was to be totally
forgotten.  Ditto for Bertha (Betty) Brainard, the first woman executive at
NBC, who along with the better known Judith Waller, made important changes
in programming at NBC as well as being role models for women who wanted to
do something other than a cooking show. Bertha worked in a number of
executive capacities at NBC from the network's inception till she finally
retired in early 1946, and a number of oral histories I have read from
early announcers who knew her in the WJZ days credit her with improving
their on-air sound.  Yet, despite a career that spanned over 2 decades,
when NBC wrote its 25th anniversary history for Variety, she was not even
mentioned.  An embarrassed NBC exec wrote a letter to Variety several weeks
later admitting they had "forgotten" to include her.

I have the feeling that in some cases, it was only the announcers (the
people in front of the mike) and the inventors who remained in the public's
collective memory.  The many women who were writers, producers, sound
effects experts, or musical directors somehow did not seem important, and
today few people are aware they even existed.  Yet without them, many of
the great OTR shows would never have taken place.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:23:23 -0400
From: "J. Randolph Cox" <cox@[removed];
To: <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  Catalog of Copyright Entries

As a former Government Documents Librarian, I should have remembered to
mention the Catalog of Copyright Entries in my earlier posting when I
referred to checking with the Office of Copyright in Washington, DC. So,
thanks to the Jack Benny poster for reminding me! Any library which is a
depository for government publications may have this, but not if they are
selective depositories. This is something that only a Regional Depository
may have -- there is usually one Regional for each state. It is a wonderful
tool. Depending on your needs, you may still wish to check with the
Copyright Office to be certain there are no other rights or parties
involved.

Many years ago, while I was working on a log of the Nick Carter radio shows
(as part of that history of Nick Carter), I found that the Syracuse
University Library (home of the Street & Smith Collection) lacked the final
16 (or so) weeks of the _Nick Carter, Master Detective_ show in their
collection. Reason? Street & Smith appears to have sent their only copies of
the scripts for those episodes to the Office of Copyright and had not
retained any file copies. I obtained a letter of permission from Conde Nast
to examine and photocopy said scripts and went to Washington to look at
them. Before the scripts were brought to me someone ran a cross check of
them to determine if there were any other rights involved.

I wish now I had made photocopies of all the missing scripts instead of
being so selective. At the time I thought I couldn't afford the costs. I
simply haven't found the time to go back and retrieve them again. For one
thing, I'd like to present the missing scripts to Syracuse to complete their
set.

Randy Cox

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:23:52 -0400
From: [removed]@[removed]
To: <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  Question for Harlan Stone

Hi Hal,

I'm a 37 year old British OTR listener.  (The one who asked about why so few
episodes remaining of Archie that you kindly answered).

As you can probably work out from my age, the world of that time, and in
your country come to that, is a complete mystery.  What were things like
back then ?  Is there anything you can tell us that you can spare from the
book ?  I'm really curious both in terms of whether the shows of that era
accurately reflect the real world and also what life was like for a boy who
was a radio star ?

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:25:04 -0400
From: SanctumOTR@[removed]
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  Re: X-MINUS ONE and "Tony Karloff"

"Mike Kerezman" writes:

I've read recent posts with great interest. The fact is RSI has in the
past used Cease and Desist actions against websites carrying Public domain
shows. The following web [removed] received a cease
and desist letter. The owner of this site after spending time and money
"doing his homework" put his site back up because he was able to determine
that RSI cannot lay exclusive claim to X Minus One although they claimed to
in their Cease and Desist [removed]

***Did he also check the underlying copyrights on the stories themselves . .
. like the copyrighted works of Ray Bradbury?  Having spoken to Ray (who has
written the forewords for both my RSI Science Fiction historical booklets), I
know that RSI has agreements with him for audio use of his stories . . . and
I've been told by longtime associates of Ray's that Bradbury is quite
protective of his stories . . . which is why I asked Ray's permission before
recreating "Zero Hour" at FOTR a few years back.***

And Stewart Wright comments:

Veteran radio actors Hans Conried and Jerry Hausner starred in an
early episode of The Adventures of Harry Nile series - "Favor For A
Friend" - that was recorded in 1978, but the episode was not aired when
planned because of a change in the station's format. The episode finally
aired in 1990.  This episode also featured Tony Karloff, the son of actor
Boris Karloff.

***Tony Karloff is NOT Boris' son.  I recall reading in one of Boris
Karloff's biographies that Tony request permission from Karloff to use the
same last name professionally and that Boris gave it since he didn't want to
interfere with another performer's livelihood.  However, Tony Karloff later
supposedly began representing himself as Boris's son which has been reported
to be a misrepresentation. --ANTHONY TOLLIN***

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:25:40 -0400
From: "Richard Pratz" <[removed]@[removed];
To: "OTR (Plain Text Only)" <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  Nits

I know it's off the subject of OTR, but I just wanted to thank the MANY
people who actually sat down and took the time to answer my tongue-in-cheek
posting (Issue 181) about nit-picking. I said I was probably nit-picking to
correct one small word in the "Beulah Show" theme song; ie: Lawd instead of
log. Then I jokingly added "What is a nit anyway?"

[removed] received a ton of private responses including some with graphics!
I definitely now know more about nits than I care to and feel like a nit-wit
for even posing the question. Please don't send me envelopes containing dead
nits! (I should have asked my wife who is an OR nurse and has seen a few in
her day)

All this illustrated three things to me; The power of the written [removed]
power of the [removed] above all, the power of the OTR Digest!! Ask a
question [removed] [removed] by golly, someone will come up with an
answer. Even Administrivia replied!

All you OTR contributors are GREAT! You made my day and left me laughing.

Rich

PS -  If a nit is the egg of a [removed] the heck is a nitwit?
          JUST KIDDING!! JUST KIDDING!! DON'T WRITE ME!!

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:26:10 -0400
From: "Owens Pomeroy" <opomeroy@[removed];
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  OTR CLUBS/NEWSLETTERS

  I just wanted to thank Stewart for defending the OTR clubs across the
country. There are a lot of OTR buffs who do not have email and our
newsletters is the only way they can enjoy reading articles about OTR, by
OTR Performers who are members of the various clubs. Ours "On The Air" is
read by members Bob Hope, Jackson Beck, Arthur Anderson, Ronald Reagan, Bea
Wain, Eddie Bracken.  We constantly get letters of praise from members -
both Media and fans - telling us how much they enjoy reading the re-prints
from the old Radio Magazines from the Hey-Day of radio.

   Next February we will be celebrating 30 years of continuous Club
Activity. We are the oldest (active) OTR Club in the [removed]

Owens L. Pomeroy, Co-founder
Golden Radio Buffs Of MD, Inc.
Editor: On The Air

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:36:03 -0400
From: "Jerry Haendiges" <Jerry@[removed];
To: <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  "Living" Series

From: "Welsa" <welsa@[removed];

... It appears to be a radio show and it is called Tomorrow 1949.
This particular episode has as its sole guest, Fred Allen.  He
attempts to define humor and give examples of various types of humor.
It is a solo performance by him, and it appears to be before a studio
audience.  Anyone ever heard of this show?  Have any history or
details about?  Thanks much.   Ted Meland

	Hi Ted,

	That series is actually "Living 1949."  "Living 19xx (48,49,50,51)" ran
from 2-29-48 through 9-29-51.  The particular program you have is the fifth
program from "Living 1949" and aired 1-30-49 entitled "The State Of American
Humor.

	If you wish to find out more information on the series, you may go to
my
Website, The Vintage Radio Place at <[removed]>. Go down to the "Main
Table of Contents" and click on "Vintage Radio Logs." Then just click on
"Living 1949," or any of the other over 500 logs listed there to view,
download or print out the log(s). All programs with catalog or location
numbers are available for purchase there also on CD, Cassette and other
formats.

	You may also find this series listed in my on-line CD / cassette
catalog
which is located at <[removed]> OTRSite On-Line Catalog. To
use this catalog, your browser must be Frames compliant and you should be
running at a resolution setting of 800x600 or higher for best viewing
(although lower resolution settings may be used).

	I hope this helps. If you have any other questions, please feel free to
contact me.

	Jerry Haendiges <Jerry@[removed];

[removed] The Vintage Radio Place
Largest source of OTR Logs, Articles and programs on the Net
Available on CD, Cassette, Reel to Reel, DAT, VHS

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:36:01 -0400
From: Eric Cooper <ejcooper2001@[removed];
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  Re:Tomorrow 1949

I believe the show referred to as Tomorrow is actually entitled "Living
19__" and is listed in Dunning's book as "Living 1948" It ran from
1948-1951 and was an NBC documentary series.


Eric Cooper

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:35:59 -0400
From: hal stone <dualxtwo@[removed];
To: <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  Protecting my butt.

Chris of OTRChris@[removed]

wrote, following his comments thanking me for my recent posting Re: Skip
Homeier:

Anyways,  I  want to thank Harlan Stone for contributing to this list as I
have enjoyed
his many postings and  would love to hear more from him on his OTR days.
I am sure his postings  are certainly  popular  and someone may combine all
his  postings into one  book  and make a lot of money .
But I am not  sure who exactly  owns the rights to these  postings . Perhaps
we
should read the small print  at the end of the digest.    :  )

Thanks for the warning, Chris. :)

Copyright, Copywrite, CopyriteŠŠ I don't care how you spell it, but I lay
claim to them all.   :)

Hey Charlie!!! do my postings become Public Domain since I posted them
"Publicly" in this forum? Or do I have to put the C symbol at the end
following each posting? :)

Now where the heck is that "symbol" hiding on my keyboard. Help!

But, from the education I've been getting about copyrights in this Digest, I
think I'm protected, Chris. I certainly hope so. But rest assured, I have
not revealed everything I know about my days in OTR for that very reason. I
have kept a lot in reserve, otherwise, who the heck would want to buy the
book I'm writing if I divulged all in these pages. Dumb I'm not.

But I seriously doubt I'll ever finish the book if I keep spending so much
time reading all, and answering some, of the voluminous postings in these
pages every day. That's a career in itself.

Open Letter to Carl Amari: I hereby claim any and all rights, IN PERPETUITY,
for anything to do with my career as a performer in OTR. :)

Just Kidding Carl. Heck, if Carl's as big a force in OTR as he appears to
be, I better stay on his good side if I want him to help promote my book
sales. (If it ever gets finished, that is.)

There I go. Alienating potential readers who are among his detractors. :)

Discretion is the better part of valor. I'd better stay neutral on the
subject. It's just a shame that there is so much dissention in the OTR
ranks.

Hal(Harlan)Stone    © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © ©
© © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © ©.

The above Copyright symbols are for this posting, and all my other postings.
Please cut out individual ©'s and paste them to stuff I wrote over the past
few months. thanks! :)

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 20:35:57 -0400
From: "Mike Kerezman" <philipmarlowe@[removed];
To: <[removed]@[removed];
Subject:  Harry Bartell Writing

I recently ran across the Radio Historical Association Colorado website
([removed])
which mentioned Harry Bartell had written some fiction. I was wondering if
someone out there had more information on this. Title information would be
sufficient.

Mike Kerezman

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 21:32:55 -0400
From: "Stephen A Kallis, Jr." <skallisjr@[removed];
To: [removed]@[removed]
Subject:  Please Pass the Embalming Fluid

Steven Lewis, speaking of Carl Amari, notes,

One thing, perhaps, we can all agree on is that it is sad that someone
who obviously loves OTR and is wlling to go the extra mile to bring it to
us with such high fidelity should be so despised by so many in the
community he attempts to serve.

This horse is not only dead, but is getting a little rank.  However, this
observation is worth noting.  I, for one, don't despise Mr. Amari.  Many
of the people I've communicated with don't appear to, though I never
asked the question directly.  My comments on the RSI/MediaBay controversy
have been limited to that if the reports are accurate, he seems to have
exhibited business practices that can be deplored.  He may feel
justified; others may feel bullied and/or victimized.

You may recall the fable of the blind men and the elephant: One smacked
into the side of the beast and said the elephant was like a wall.
Another grabbed the animal's tail, and swore the elephant was like a
rope.  Amother got the tusk, and said the critter was like a spear.
Another got the trunk, and noted that the elephant was like a snake.
Finally, another had grabbed the leg, and said the pachyderm was like a
tree.  All were partially right, and totally wrong.  It may be that both
sides of the controversy are only partially correct.  But it's worth
recalling that there may be more than one valid perspective.

Stephen A. Kallis, Jr.

--------------------------------
End of [removed] Digest V01 Issue #184
*******************************************

Copyright [removed] Communications, York, PA; All Rights Reserved,
  including republication in any form.

If you enjoy this list, please consider financially supporting it:
   [removed]

For Help: [removed]@[removed]
To Unsubscribe: [removed]@[removed]

For Help with the Archive Server, send the command ARCHIVE HELP
  in the SUBJECT of a message to [removed]@[removed]

To contact the listmaster, mail to listmaster@[removed]

To Send Mail to the list, simply send to [removed]@[removed]